We study the impact of information technology (IT) on the profitabilit
y of individual organization designs and on the relative profitability
of different organization designs. We develop models where organizati
on design is defined by the location of investment decision authority.
We consider global and local investment when there is an information
asymmetry between a central authority and decentralized nodes-decentra
lized nodes make better local investment decisions because of their lo
cal knowledge. We define three separate organization designs: a hierar
chy where all investments are made by a central authority, a market wh
ere all investments are made by the decentralized nodes, and a mixed m
ode where global investments are made by a central authority and local
investments are made by decentralized nodes. Because of complementari
ties between global and local investment, we show that there is underi
nvestment relative to first-best in all three organization designs. We
also find that IT can be used to mitigate that underinvestment, eithe
r by bringing information to the decision maker or by redesigning the
monitoring and incentive structure. We demonstrate that IT does not ne
cessarily favor decentralized organization designs, and we show how th
e costs of coordination may result in the mixed mode being dominated b
y one or both of the alternative organization designs. Thus, collocati
on of investment decision rights and information that results in decis
ions that require coordination might not be optimal when the costs of
not synchronizing global and local investment are high.