TREE DIVERSITY, LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY, AND ECONOMICS OF MAPLE-BIRCH FORESTS - IMPLICATIONS OF MARKOVIAN MODELS

Citation
Cr. Lin et J. Buongiorno, TREE DIVERSITY, LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY, AND ECONOMICS OF MAPLE-BIRCH FORESTS - IMPLICATIONS OF MARKOVIAN MODELS, Management science, 44(10), 1998, pp. 1351-1366
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Management,"Operatione Research & Management Science","Operatione Research & Management Science
Journal title
ISSN journal
00251909
Volume
44
Issue
10
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1351 - 1366
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-1909(1998)44:10<1351:TDLDAE>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Markov decision process (MDP) models were effective in analyzing fores t management policies. Even the simplest standard results gave useful insights into forest ecology, such as how landscape diversity is shape d by natural catastrophes, and how forests mature through successional phases. The methods were also useful to predict the effects of differ ent management policies on ecological and economic criteria. Optimizat ion augmented the usefulness of the approach, suggesting that income f rom Wisconsin's maple-birch forests could be increased without ruining their diversity of landscape, tree size, and tree species. It showed that maximizing species diversity, defined by the distribution of tree s in shade-tolerance classes, would require some harvest. Instead, max imum tree size diversity occurred in unmanaged forests, but this gave a less diverse landscape and no income. The MDP method allowed for the design of compromise policies that would maximize income while keepin g diversity above specified limits. The opportunity cost of increasing tree size diversity was found to be much higher than for species dive rsity. Comparing the maximum timber income owners could have got with what they actually cut suggested that the amenity value of forests was four times that of timber. Advantages of the methods reside in the ab ility to model complex ecosystem processes with simple probability mat rices, and in the rich MDP theory and algorithms. Limitations include the difficulty of defining a space set large enough for accurate discr etization, but small enough for practical application.