Objectives: To define the types of surgery performed by rural surgeons
, to compare their experience to that of graduating US surgical reside
nts and to document rural surgical mortality. Design: Prospective regi
stry of consecutive cases recorded by 7 rural general surgeons working
in one department of surgery from December 31, 1994, through March 30
, 1996. Comparison with the 1995 Report C (Resident Operative Logs) of
the Residency Review Committee. National survey of surgical residency
programs regarding formal gynecology experience. Setting: Nine rural
community hospitals in the Midwest. Patients: Patients undergoing surg
ery in 9 cities with populations of fewer than 10 000. Main Outcome Me
asures: Type of surgery and postoperative (30-day) mortality. Results:
Two thousand four hundred twenty procedures were performed by 7 surge
ons practicing in 9 cities with populations of 1500 to 8000. There wer
e 6 (0.25%) postoperative deaths. Case types are as follows: endoscopy
, 686 (28.3%); gynecology, 498 (20.6%); hernia, 241 (10%); colorectal,
194 (8%); biliary, 183 (7.6%); cesarean sections, 130 (5.4%); breast,
129 (5.3%); orthopedic, 115 (4.8%); carpal tunnel, 63 (2.6%); otolary
ngology, 35 (1.4%); and endocrine, 1 (0.4%); for a total of 2420 (100%
). Report C indicated 1995 graduating chief residents averaged 8 obste
tric and and gynecologic and 5.3 orthopedic cases during their residen
cy. Of 204 surgical residency programs surveyed, 106 (52%) offered no
obstetrics and gynecology rotation. Conclusions: A large volume of sur
gery was performed with low mortality by 7 rural general surgeons. The
operative experience of 1995 residency graduates differed from our ru
ral surgeons. We recommend a rural surgical track in selected training
programs to prepare graduates better for rural practice. Senior level
rotations in endoscopic, gynecologic, obstetric, and orthopedic surge
ry and mentorship with rural surgeons would be optimal.