SPECTRUM OF GENERAL-SURGERY IN RURAL AMERICA

Citation
J. Landercasper et al., SPECTRUM OF GENERAL-SURGERY IN RURAL AMERICA, Archives of surgery, 132(5), 1997, pp. 494-496
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
ISSN journal
00040010
Volume
132
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
494 - 496
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(1997)132:5<494:SOGIRA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objectives: To define the types of surgery performed by rural surgeons , to compare their experience to that of graduating US surgical reside nts and to document rural surgical mortality. Design: Prospective regi stry of consecutive cases recorded by 7 rural general surgeons working in one department of surgery from December 31, 1994, through March 30 , 1996. Comparison with the 1995 Report C (Resident Operative Logs) of the Residency Review Committee. National survey of surgical residency programs regarding formal gynecology experience. Setting: Nine rural community hospitals in the Midwest. Patients: Patients undergoing surg ery in 9 cities with populations of fewer than 10 000. Main Outcome Me asures: Type of surgery and postoperative (30-day) mortality. Results: Two thousand four hundred twenty procedures were performed by 7 surge ons practicing in 9 cities with populations of 1500 to 8000. There wer e 6 (0.25%) postoperative deaths. Case types are as follows: endoscopy , 686 (28.3%); gynecology, 498 (20.6%); hernia, 241 (10%); colorectal, 194 (8%); biliary, 183 (7.6%); cesarean sections, 130 (5.4%); breast, 129 (5.3%); orthopedic, 115 (4.8%); carpal tunnel, 63 (2.6%); otolary ngology, 35 (1.4%); and endocrine, 1 (0.4%); for a total of 2420 (100% ). Report C indicated 1995 graduating chief residents averaged 8 obste tric and and gynecologic and 5.3 orthopedic cases during their residen cy. Of 204 surgical residency programs surveyed, 106 (52%) offered no obstetrics and gynecology rotation. Conclusions: A large volume of sur gery was performed with low mortality by 7 rural general surgeons. The operative experience of 1995 residency graduates differed from our ru ral surgeons. We recommend a rural surgical track in selected training programs to prepare graduates better for rural practice. Senior level rotations in endoscopic, gynecologic, obstetric, and orthopedic surge ry and mentorship with rural surgeons would be optimal.