Ionizing radiation produces many types of DNA lesions that have the po
tential of killing cells. The lethal lesion is probably an unrepaired
or misrepaired double-strand break produced as part of a complex lesio
n. A variety of DNA damage assays have been applied in an effort to pr
edict the sensitivity of cells to ionizing radiation. However, the rel
ationships between initial DNA damage, rejoining of breaks and ultimat
e cell killing by radiation are not fully understood or predictable. W
hile most repair-deficient cell lines can be identified based on slowe
r strand break rejoining, controversy surrounds the ability of DNA dam
age assays to rank the radiosensitivity of tumor cells reliably in ter
ms of results of clonogenic assays. Part of the difficulty may be that
the most relevant lesions, those that are closely spaced locally or r
egionally, cannot be easily quantified. It is also possible that the D
NA damage can be interpreted differently (in relation to repairability
) depending on cell type and/or DNA damage assay. Repair itself does n
ot always increase survival, and survival is the outcome of the action
s of several pathways that can be both cell- and tissue-specific. Meas
urements of misrepair leading to chromosome damage and mutation have b
een helpful in ranking the radiosensitivity of cell lines, and may be
a requirement for predictive assays. These concepts are illustrated wi
th results from alkaline and neutral comet assays developed to detect
single-strand breaks and double-strand breaks in individual cells. (C)
1998 by Radiation Research Society.