Bj. Anderson et al., UARS OBSERVATIONS OF BIRKELAND CURRENTS AND JOULE HEATING RATES FOR THE NOVEMBER 4, 1993, STORM, J GEO R-S P, 103(A11), 1998, pp. 26323-26335
Magnetic field and particle observations from the Upper Atmosphere Res
earch Satellite particle environment monitor (UARS/PEM) are used to es
timate field-aligned currents, electron precipitation energy flux, ion
ospheric conductivities, and Joule heating rates during the main phase
of the November 4, 1993, geomagnetic storm. From 0300 to 1200 UT on N
ovember 4 the auroral oval expanded equatorward of 65 degrees magnetic
latitude (MLAT), and UARS encountered the polar cap on seven consecut
ive passes during the storm main phase. These passes provide data appr
opriate to determine field-aligned currents and estimate ionospheric J
oule heating. For this storm, UARS sampled the midnight to dawn sector
in the northern hemisphere and the noon to dusk sector in the souther
n hemisphere. The maximum net currents on the dayside and nightside ar
e comparable and reach 1 A/m for several hours. The average Joule heat
ing rates are comparable at midnight, early morning, and noon, where t
hey are 9.2, 6.6, and 7.7 GW/h, respectively, but have a strong peak i
n the late afternoon, where they are 25.6 GW/h. In contrast, the elect
ron precipitation energy deposition is highest near midnight at 5.6 GW
/h but drops to less than half this level to 2.4 GW/h and 1.9 GW/h in
the early morning and at dusk, respectively, but is very small near no
on, only 0.24 GW/h. The Joule to particle energy deposition rate ratio
thus varies by roughly an order of magnitude with local time, being o
ver 40 near noon, about 20 at dusk, 3 near dawn, and 2 at midnight. Th
e hemispherical Joule and electron precipitation heating rates, H-J an
d H-elec, are estimated to have been 290 GW and 50 GW, respectively, g
iving H-J/H-elec = 4.5 and H-J + H-elec = 340 GW. Differences between
these averages and assimilative mapping of ionospheric dynamics (AMIE)
results, H-J = 200 GW and H-elec = 80 GW, reflect time variability du
ring the storm and are largely resolved when AMIE results only at the
times of UARS passes are considered.