DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOME OF TWINS BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED REFERRALS

Citation
H. Minakami et al., DIFFERENCE IN OUTCOME OF TWINS BETWEEN EARLY AND DELAYED REFERRALS, Journal of perinatal medicine, 26(4), 1998, pp. 302-307
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology",Pediatrics
ISSN journal
03005577
Volume
26
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
302 - 307
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-5577(1998)26:4<302:DIOOTB>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Data on the prognosis of twins from tertiary institutions may not repr esent the general incidence of adverse infant outcomes. We retrospecti vely investigated the infant outcome in 32 twin gestations referred to us at 29.9 +/- 3.7 weeks of gestation (range, 21 to 38 weeks) (late r eferral group) and 237 twin gestations that had been monitored by us s ince < 20 weeks' gestation (control group). The physical and neurologi cal status of infants was assessed at 1 year of corrected age. Deliver y occurred 3.1 weeks earlier in the late referral group than in the co ntrol group (32.4 +/- 3.9 vs 35.5 +/- 2.4 weeks, p < 0.001). Deaths by 1 year of age and disabilities such as cerebral palsy, mental retarda tion, and epilepsy occurred in 16 (25%) of 64 infants in the late refe rral group compared with 24 (5.1%) of 474 infants in the control group (p < 0.001). Thus, the inclusion of data on women who were referred l ate increased the incidence of adverse infant outcomes in our tertiary hospital from 5.1% to 7.4% (40/538). It was not known whether an earl y referral to a tertiary hospital would have improved the outcome in t he late referral group. These findings suggest that data from tertiary institutions on the prognosis of twins may be affected adversely by t he inclusion of data on women who are referred because of complication s.