'Stages', as used in clinical practice and research, are defined, thei
r value described, and criteria are proposed for their evaluation. The
specific interest is in staging Alzheimer's disease (AD). Two staging
systems, one based on the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) and one ba
sed on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), are compared in terms of the
se criteria, as an illustration of the process involved. We propose th
at there is not one unique staging system, that different staging crit
eria might be appropriate to different research or clinical needs, dep
ending on which part of the temporal course of the disease is of prima
ry interest, and on whether the focus is on cognitive, functional, neu
rological, behavioral, economic, or other issues. GDS staging seems a
better choice for the later stages of AD when the focus is on function
al change. MMSE staging seems a better choice for tracking the earlier
stages of AD when the focus is on cognitive change.