B. Eyre et al., A SUSPENDED SEDIMENT BUDGET FOR THE MODIFIED SUBTROPICAL BRISBANE RIVER ESTUARY, AUSTRALIA, Estuarine, coastal and shelf science (Print), 47(4), 1998, pp. 513-522
Annual suspended sediment budgets, for an average flow year and a wet
year, were constructed for the sub-tropical Brisbane River estuary. Th
e input of marine sediment from Moreton Bay is the dominant source of
suspended sediment (about 456000 t) to the Brisbane River estuary duri
ng an average flow year, contributing more than 1.5 times the sediment
delivered from the catchment (about 178000 t) and urban areas (about
112000 t) combined. As the volume of water discharged during floods in
creases, the sediment retention efficiency of the Brisbane River estua
ry decreases rapidly due to the flushing of sediment through its mouth
. As such, although the input of sediment from the catchment increased
three-fold (600000 t) during 1996 associated with a 20 year return pe
riod flood, marine sediment was still the dominant source of sediment
deposited in the estuary because 77% of the fluvial sediment was expor
ted to Moreton Bay. Dredging has increased the sediment trapping capac
ity of the estuary with more than a two-fold increase in the flood wat
er volume needed (about 2000 x 10(6) m(3)) to flush the estuary fresh
at the mouth compared to pre-1962. An upstream dam traps a large propo
rtion of the catchment sediment load, but the upstream retention of fl
ood water has also increased the trapping capacity of the estuary by r
educing the freshwater flow. As such, about 22% (33000 t) more sedimen
t was deposited in the estuary during a 20 year return period flood in
May 1996 than would have been deposited prior to dam construction. Th
e sub-tropical Brisbane River estuary has a lower and more variable se
diment trapping efficiency than typical temperate northern hemisphere
estuaries. (C) 1998 Academic Press.