The ideal model for phase I and II testing of potential breast cancer
chemoprevention agents has yet to be delineated clearly. Phase I trial
s are heterogeneous in their design. For a drug with minimal prior hum
an exposure, classic phase I dose-range finding tests are performed fi
rst in normal volunteers. A non-to-minimally toxic dose range is estab
lished and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies are performed.
Once the dose range is established, later phase I trials seek to estab
lish a nontoxic dose at which biochemical activity or surrogate endpoi
nt biomarker (SEB) activity is modulated. Phase II trials are randomiz
ed, double-blind efficacy trials in which modulation of previously val
idated SEBs is used as the measure of response. Phase ii trials also i
dentify new potential SEBs. Late-phase I and II trials usually are per
formed in high-risk cohorts. Drugs showing minimal toxicity and good m
odulation of SEBs are advanced to randomized phase III trials in high-
risk cohorts. Endpoints for phase III trials are decreased cancer inci
dence, validation of potential SEBs identified in phase II trials, and
a decrease in cancer-specific and overall mortality. This article rev
iews the authors' experience with phase I and II breast cancer chemopr
evention trials, and makes recommendations for future studies based on
the authors' recent experience.