The issue of self-disclosure reflects an interest in allowing the anal
yst to be present in the analytic situation in a way previously prohib
ited, as a fully participating subject. The authors develop the concep
t of the full-fledged communicational context as a way of allowing for
, or even requiring, some form of voluntary self-disclosure. Anonymity
is examined in the light of its claim to foster patient self-revelati
on. The authors maintain that such a claim is seriously flawed. Their
examination of the concept of analytic objectivity located its foundat
ion in the intersubjective field; therefore, the claim that objectivit
y is fostered by interpersonal distancing and anonymity is suspect. Fu
rther, they assert that asymmetry in the analytic dyad, although unavo
idable in many respects, could be significantly reduced, with benefici
al effects for both analyst and patient.