This article evaluates two competing dynamic policy-network models and
one static network model by applying them to local politics in Amster
dam. In the dynamic models an influence relation results from the acce
ptance of an influence request. The first model, Control Maximization,
represents the view that politics are primarily power driven, and the
second, Policy Maximization, policy driven. Zn the static model (the
Two-Stage), network relations are empirically investigated as in other
policy-network models and used as a benchmark for evaluating the dyna
mic models. Policy Maximization is shown to be the most accurate predi
ctor of decision outcomes, better even than the static model, and to g
enerate richer networks. However, both dynamic models generate network
s that are too hierarchical.