The objective of this research was to determine the scope of equine fe
scue toxicosis, current procedures to control the disease, and to gain
veterinary insight to possible new therapies. A survey was developed
with help from experts in the area of fescue toxicosis. From a list of
members of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), a samp
le was obtained by selecting large animal/equine veterinarians from st
ates where fescue toxicosis is common. These states included: Alabama,
Arkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, Mississippi
, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West
Virginia. One-fifteenth of the veterinarians (515 total) were mailed q
uestionnaires; 207 responded. Veterinarians were grouped into regions
based on latitude. Region 1 included veterinarians practicing north of
39.0 degrees latitude; Region 2 included veterinarians practicing bet
ween 365 degrees and 39.0 degrees latitude; and Region 3 included vete
rinarians practicing south of 36.5 degrees latitude. A majority of hor
se pasture in the area of the survey is comprised of at least 50% fesc
ue, with approximately 70% of the pasture being at least partially com
prised of fescue. Almost 50% of the brood mares in the area of the sur
vey are exposed to endophyte-infected fescue. Many gravid brood mares
in the area of the survey were suffering from acute and subacute sympt
oms, with over 43% warranting some kind of management technique to pre
vent toxicity from occurring. A large majority of veterinarians in the
area of the survey feel that fescue toxicosis is, to some level, a pr
oblem. Current management techniques can be tedious and expensive. New
management techniques and/or therapies are needed to handle the probl
ems associated with equine fescue toxicosis. A large majority of veter
inarians in the area of the survey feel an effective drug therapy woul
d be valuable in treating equine fescue toxicosis. If a drug therapy w
ere developed, a daily feed additive or an oral gel would be the most
popular method of dosing with veterinarians. As a result of trends not
iced in the rates of equine fescue toxicosis in different areas, stati
stical analyses were conducted on data generated from this survey alon
g regions that seemed to have different infection rates. There was no
difference (P > 0.05) in levels of fescue in pastures, mare exposure t
o the endophyte, and mare expression of acute or subacute symptoms bet
ween regions 2 and 3. There was a difference (P < 0.05) between region
1 and regions 2 and 3 for all of the factors tested except for number
of mares seen by veterinarians.