Dh. Park et al., A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF AXILLARY OSMIDROSIS BY INSTRUMENT, MANUAL, AND COMBINED SUBCUTANEOUS SHAVING PROCEDURES, Annals of plastic surgery, 41(5), 1998, pp. 488-497
Between 1986 and 1996, 128 patients underwent surgery for axillary osm
idrosis via en bloc removal of subcutaneous cellular tissue. The patie
nts were followed for 6 months to 7 years (average follow-up, 25 month
s). The authors propose three categories in which they classified shav
ing procedures: instrumental shavings (N = 84), manual shavings (N = 9
6), and combined shaving procedures (N = 76). A modified Inaba's shave
r was used in instrument shavings. Combined shaving is mixture of inst
rument and conventional manual shaving. All patients were asked to com
plete a questionnaire postoperatively. This follow-up demonstrated tha
t 92.9% of patients who underwent instrument shaving, 95.8% of patient
s who underwent manual shaving, and 97.4% of patients who underwent co
mbined shaving experienced no odor or occasional, very mild axillary o
dor postoperatively. Postoperative scar formation was either invisible
or excellent in 92.9% of instrument shavings, and 92.1% of patients w
ho underwent the combined procedure reported either a hairless axilla
or a marked decrease of axillary hair. The total satisfaction rate in
the combined procedure was 94.7%, which is a better result than the in
strument (92.9%) and the manual (91.7%) shaving procedures. The wound
complication rate per patient with the combined procedure was 13.2%. T
here was no scar contracture or limitation in arm abduction. The combi
ned subcutaneous shaving procedure using the modified Inaba's shaver h
as the advantages of rapid and accurate shaving, low incidence of hema
toma formation, enhanced wound healing, and easy postoperative care. T
herefore, en bloc resection of subcutaneous cellular tissue by combine
d shaving is a viable option for treatment of axillary osmidrosis.