Ili. Levin et al., AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT IN PATIENTS OLDER THAN 85 YEARS - OUTCOMES AND THE EFFECT ON THEIR QUALITY-OF-LIFE, Coronary artery disease, 9(6), 1998, pp. 373-380
Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of aortic
valve replacement (AVR) and the effect on quality of life in patients
aged over 85 who had symptomatic aortic stenosis. Methods We performe
d a retrospective analysis of 21 patients, aged 85-91 years (mean age
86.5), who underwent AVR, 10 of whom underwent concomitant coronary ar
tery bypass grafting (CABG) between 1989 and 1995. All patients were c
ategorized as New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III a
nd IV. A questionnaire was used to evaluate heart symptoms and quality
of life among the 13 patients who were alive at follow-up (9-83 month
s). Results Eighteen patients were categorized as NYHA functional clas
s I and II for 1 year (9 months for one patient) after AVR. Three pati
ents, all undergoing concomitant CABG, died early. The overall 1-, 2-
and 3-year actuarial survival rate was 85%, 64% and 53% (among the pat
ients undergoing only AVR the figures were 100%, 100% and 85%). Follow
-up questionnaire results showed an improvement in the patients' sympt
oms of heart disease, dyspnea (P = 0.017) and angina (P = 0.03). An im
provement in the patients' physical functioning (P = 0.025), satisfact
ion with physical ability (P = 0.005), sleep (P = 0.025), health statu
s (P = 0.025) and perception of general health (P = 0.005) was also ob
served. Conclusions Our results show that AVR can be performed on pati
ents greater than or equal to 85 years of age or older, with an improv
ement in heart symptoms and quality of life. Coronary Artery Dis 9:373
-380 (C) 1998 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.