A. Pirzkall et al., RADIOSURGERY ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH WHOLE-BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY FOR BRAIN METASTASES, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(11), 1998, pp. 3563-3569
Purpose: Evaluation of the treatment outcome after radiosurgery (RS) a
lone or in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with speci
al attention to prescribed dose and its influence on local control and
survival. Patients and Methods: Between September 1984 and January 19
97, 236 patients with 311 brain metastases treated with radiosurgery m
et the following inclusion criteria: one to three brain metastases per
patient; no previous WBRT; and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) gre
ater than or equal to 50%. One,hundred fifty-eight patients treated on
ly with RS received a median dose of 20 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodo
se line; 78 patients received RS with a median dose of 15 Gy/80% and a
n additional course of WBRT. Results: For the entire series, overall m
edian survival was 5.5 months, with control of CNS disease achieved in
92% of the treated brain metastases; the results were not significant
ly different between patients treated by RS with or without WBRT. Howe
ver, in patients without evidence of extracranial disease, median surv
ival wets increased for patients who received WBRT (15.4 vs 8.3 months
; P = .08). Additionally, there was a suggestion that increased doses
for patients treated with RS only resulted in improved outcome. Four l
esions were suspicious for radiation necrosis by magnetic resonance im
aging (MRI); in one of the four lesions, radiation necrosis was confir
med histologically. the incidence of transient low-grade toxicity was
18%; symptoms could be treated by the temporary administration of ster
oids. Conclusion: RS is an effective, noninvasive means of controlling
brain metastases when used alone or in combination with WBRT. There i
s a trend for superior local control and especially in patients withou
t extracranial disease for superior survival when RS is used in conjun
ction with WBRT. Randomized trials would seem to be warranted, compari
ng the benefit of RS with or without additional WBRT. (C) 1998 by Amer
ican Society of Clinical Oncology.