IFOSFAMIDE-CONTAINING CHEMOTHERAPY IN EWINGS-SARCOMA - THE 2ND UNITED-KINGDOM CHILDRENS-CANCER-STUDY-GROUP AND THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCILEWING TUMOR STUDY
A. Craft et al., IFOSFAMIDE-CONTAINING CHEMOTHERAPY IN EWINGS-SARCOMA - THE 2ND UNITED-KINGDOM CHILDRENS-CANCER-STUDY-GROUP AND THE MEDICAL-RESEARCH-COUNCILEWING TUMOR STUDY, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(11), 1998, pp. 3628-3633
Purpose: to investigate the possibility that the substitution of ifosf
amide for cyclophosphamide therapy for Ewing's sarcoma will improve su
rvival over that seen in the first United Kingdom Children's Cancer St
udy Group (UKCCSG) Ewing's tumor study (ET-I). Patients and Methods: B
etween 1987 and 1993, 243 patients (138 men or boys) were entered onto
the study The median age was 13.5 years (range, 1.5 to 27 years). The
median follow-up was 58 months. Chemotherapy included four courses of
vincristine 2 mg/m(2); ifosfamide 9 g/m(2); and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2
) administered every 3 weeks. Treatment of the primary tumor was with
surgery and/or radiotherapy followed by ifosfamide 6 g/m(2); doxorubic
in 60 mg/m(2); and vincristine 2 mg/m(2); with actinomycin D 1.5 mg/m(
2) substituted for doxorubicin after a total dose of 420 mg/m(2). Resu
lts: Two hundred one patients had no metastases, One hundred eighteen
patients had tumors of the axial skeleton and 125 patients had limb pr
imary tumors. The major toxicities were hematologic and infective, but
there were no toxic deaths. The overall survival rate was 62% (95% co
nfidence interval [CI], 56 to 69) and relapse-free survival (RFS) 56%
(95% CI, 49 to 62). For those with no metastases at diagnosis, the RFS
rate was 62% and for those with metastases, 23%. Multivariate analysi
s showed age and site to have a significant effect on RFS. Pelvic site
s had the worst RFS rate of 41%; other axial sites, 55%; and extremity
tumors, 73%, Age younger than 10 years had an RFS rate of 86% versus
55% for older patients. The local relapse rate for axial tumors was 20
% and for limb primary tumors was 2.4%, Conclusion: The 5-year surviva
l rate of 62% is improved compared with the 44% survival rate achieved
in ET-l, This is probably caused by the use of higher doses of ifosfa
mide compared with relatively low doses of cyclophosphamide in ET-1. (
C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.