A treatment against osteoporosis can be considered efficacious only wh
en its beneficial effects on bone remodeling, bone mass, and osteoporo
tic fracture incidence are proven. As for any treatment, proven effica
cy must be combined with proven safety. This review analyzes published
data on efficacy and safety of alendronate, clodronate and etidronate
, the bisphosphonates currently marketed in Italy for osteoporosis tre
atment. Different studies have shown that alendronate, clodronate and
etidronate reduce bone turnover, and increase bone mineral density in
postmenopausal osteoporotic patients. Prospective, double blind, multi
center studies reported a reduction in osteoporotic fracture incidence
for alendronate and etidronate. Fracture incidence reduction by clodr
onate, on the other hand, was shown only in an open label study. Final
ly, a reduction in fracture incidence by etidronate was shown in a lar
ge retrospective postmarketing study. Postmarketirrg surveillance evid
enced that osteomalacia, a suspected side effect of etidronate treatme
nt, does not occur at the currently used dose regimens. Postmarketing
surveillance of alendronate has recently raised some concern regarding
possible severe esophageal damage during alendronate treatment, espec
ially when the drug is not taken according to the manufacturer's instr
uctions. (Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 10: 284-294, 1998) (C) 1998, Editrice
Kurtis.