Jb. Ferdy et al., POLLINATOR BEHAVIOR AND DECEPTIVE POLLINATION - LEARNING-PROCESS AND FLORAL EVOLUTION, The American naturalist, 152(5), 1998, pp. 696-705
Some species of flowering plants engage in nonmodel deceptive pollinat
ion, attracting pollinators by large nonmimetic floral displays and pr
oviding no reward. Pollinators can learn to avoid deceptive plants and
to favor nectariferous species. The reproductive success of these spe
cies is expected to be density dependent for two opposite reasons: the
commoner cheating flowers are, the easier they are to avoid and the l
ower the quality of the patch, making it more difficult to recognize t
hat unrewarding flowers are not profitable. When a deceptive species i
s made up of multiple floral variants, pollinators' learning could dec
rease the reproductive success of any particularly common floral varia
nt. Within a population of deceptive plants, mean reproductive success
could, therefore, vary with the number of floral variants. We investi
gate these three hypotheses by modeling the behavior of pollinators fo
raging in communities of deceptive and rewarding flowers. Simulations
revealed that the reproductive success of deceptive flowers varies in
a density-dependent manner and that floral variants can be submitted t
o negative frequency-dependent selection. We compare density dependenc
e in nonmodel deceptive species to what is expected in Batesian mimics
and discuss possible selection of morphological variants. Finally, we
survey how pollinators' learning capacities can make mean reproductiv
e success depend on morphological variability within a population.