L. Kerschhofer et al., POLYMORPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS BETWEEN OLIVINE, WADSLEYITE AND RINGWOODITE - MECHANISMS OF INTRACRYSTALLINE NUCLEATION AND THE ROLE OF ELASTICSTRAIN, Mineralogical Magazine, 62(5), 1998, pp. 617-638
Kinetic models and rate equations for polymorphic reconstructive phase
transformations in polycrystalline aggregates are usually based on th
e assumptions that (a) the product phase nucleates on grain boundaries
in the reactant phase and (b) growth rates of the product phase remai
n constant with time at fixed P-T. Recent observations of experimental
ly-induced transformations between (Mg,Fe)(2)SiO4 olivine (alpha) and
its high pressure polymorphs, wadsleyite (beta) and ringwoodite (gamma
), demonstrate that both these assumptions can be invalid, thus compli
cating the extrapolation of experimental kinetic data. Incoherent grai
n boundary nucleation appears to have dominated in most previous exper
imental studies of the alpha-beta-gamma transformations because of the
use of starting materials with small (<10-20 mu m) grain sizes. In co
ntrast, when large (0.6 mm) olivine single crystals are reacted, intra
crystalline nucleation of both beta and gamma becomes the dominant mec
hanism, particularly when the P-T conditions significantly overstep th
e equilibrium boundary. At pressures of 18-20 GPa intracrystalline nuc
leation involves (i) the formation of stacking faults in the olivine,
(ii) coherent nucleation of gamma-lamellae on these faults and (iii) n
ucleation of beta an gamma. In other experiments, intracrystalline nuc
leation is also observed during the beta-gamma transformation. In this
case coherent nucleation of gamma appears to occur at the intersectio
ns of dislocations with (010) stacking faults in beta, which suggests
that the nucleation rate is stress dependent. Reaction rims of beta/ga
mma form at the margins of the olivine single crystals by grain bounda
ry nucleation. Measurements of growth distance as a function of time i
ndicate that the growth rate of these rims decreases towards zero as t
ransformation progresses. The growth rate slows because of the decreas
e in the magnitude of the Gibbs free energy (stored elastic strain ene
rgy) that develops as a consequence of the large volume change of tran
sformation. On a Longer time scale, growth kinetics may be controlled
by viscoelastic relaxation.