Nj. Barker et al., DIGITAL IMAGING OF BLACK-AND-WHITE PHOTOMICROGRAPHS - IMPACT OF FILE SIZE, The American journal of surgical pathology, 22(11), 1998, pp. 1411-1416
The publication of black and white photomicrographs has a long traditi
on in pathology. High-resolution film and quality objectives have been
the backbone of generating quality photomicrographs suitable for publ
ication. However, the digital imaging revolution has changed the way w
e view and capture images. As the quality of image capture devices inc
reases and as their price decreases, more and more investigators are u
sing digital imaging, and the use of color digital imaging for telecon
ferencing, telediagnosis, and reproduction is now well established. Th
e purpose of this study was to determine the file sizes needed to obta
in publication-quality black and white images using digital imaging te
chnology. In this study, four experts in renal pathology reviewed 70 b
lack and white images of various file sizes obtained from specimens re
presenting a variety of renal histopathology. Without knowledge of the
file size, the four renal pathologists graded the degree of pixelatio
n, and the overall diagnostic and publication quality of the images.
In all cases, digital imaging was capable of obtaining publication qua
lity images equal to those achieved using film. The file size needed t
o achieve publication quality black and white images depended on magni
fication, with lower magnification images requiring larger file sizes.