FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION ON FLOW-SORTED CELLS AS A TOOL FOR EVALUATING MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE OR CHIMERISM AFTER ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
S. Cotteret et al., FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION ON FLOW-SORTED CELLS AS A TOOL FOR EVALUATING MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE OR CHIMERISM AFTER ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, Cytometry, 34(5), 1998, pp. 216-222
We studied the feasibility and the sensitivity of fluorescent in situ
hybridization (FISH) using leukemic or host/donor-specific probes on f
low-sorted cells to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) or chimerism
in transplanted patients in complete remission. We first performed ex
perimental models of MRD and chimerism by mixing HL60 cells and normal
lymphocytes in different proportions. Over 80% HL60 cells were obtain
ed from mixtures of 5% HL60 cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cell
s (PBMC). We then evaluated MRD and mixed chimerism in a chronic myelo
genous leukemia patient in relapse after allogeneic sex-mismatched bon
e marrow transplantation (BMT), who had received a donor lymphocyte in
fusion (DLI). Three months after DLI, mixed chimerism was observed in
each bone marrow (BM)-sorted lineage (CD13+, CD14+, CD20+, and CD3+),
with the highest level of recipient cells in the granulocytic lineage
(CD13+). Five months after DLI, host cells were at a low level but rem
ained detectable in the granulocytic lineage. In the same sample, the
bcr-abl gene was detected in the granulocytic lineage and not in the l
ymphocytes. We also studied chimerism in an aplastic anemia sex-mismat
ched transplanted female patient. We determined the proportion of reci
pient total lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, and CD14+ monocyte
s under cyclosporin A therapy on five peripheral blood samples and one
BM sample over 5 months. Results showed a regular decrease in recipie
nt total lymphocytes (26.6% to 10.6%) and monocytes (20.7% to 8%). CD8
+-recipient cells decreased rapidly, while CD4+ remained stable (17%),
This work demonstrates the feasibility of FISH after cell sorting, co
mbining the sensitivities of both flow cytometry and FISH and the spec
ificities of both immunophenotyping and genotype analysis. (C) 1998 Wi
ley-Liss, Inc.