Most companies view work and personal life as competing priorities in
a zero-sum game, in which a gain in one area means a loss in the other
. From this traditional perspective, managers decide how their employe
es' work and personal lives should intersect and often view work-life
programs as just so much social welfare. A new breed of managers, howe
ver, is trying a new tack, one in which managers and employees collabo
rate to achieve work and personal objectives to everyone's benefit. Th
ese managers are guided by three principles. The first is to clearly i
nform their employees about business priorities and to encourage them
to be just as clear about personal priorities. The second is to recogn
ize and support their employees as whole people, not only acknowledgin
g but also celebrating their roles outside the office. The third is to
continually experiment with the way work gets done, looking for appro
aches that enhance the organization's performance and allow employees
to pursue personal goals. The managers who are acting on these princip
les have discovered that conflicts between work and personal prioritie
s can actually be catalysts for identifying inefficiencies at the work
place. For example, one manager and his staff found a way to accommoda
te the increased workload at their 24-hour-a-day command center while
granting the staff more concentrated time off. So far, these managers
have usually been applying the principles without official sanction. B
ut as the business impact of their approach becomes better appreciated
, the authors predict, more and more companies will view these leaders
as heralds of change.