Ijm. Nijhuis et al., FETAL HEART-RATE (FHR) PARAMETERS DURING FHR PATTERN-A AND PETTERN-B - A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY FROM 24 WEEKS GESTATION, Prenatal. neonatal med., 3(4), 1998, pp. 383-393
Objectives To assess the differences in development of fetal heart rat
e (FHR) parameters of FHR patterns (FHRP) A and B, in the second half
of pregnancy and to evaluate the performance of the Sonicaid System 80
02(R) with respect to the identification of these FHR patterns. Subjec
ts and methods A total of 235 computerized FHR recordings were obtaine
d in 29 uncomplicated pregnancies longitudinally studied from 24 weeks
' gestation onwards. Nomograms were made of basal FHR, longterm (LTV)
and short-term (STV) FHR variation during both FHRP A and B, using mul
tilevel analysis. Results During gestation, basal FHR decreased in bot
h FHRP A and B. LN and STV increased during FHRP B and slightly decrea
sed during FHRP A near term. For both FHRP A and B, intrafetal varianc
e was much smaller than the total variance, indicating intrafetal cons
istency. At all gestational ages, the Sonicaid System poorly identifie
d A and B patterns. This was largely due to a strong correlation of bo
th LTV and STV with FHR. Correction for rate resulted in 'correct' ide
ntification in more than 85% of recordings. Conclusions We provide ref
erence ranges for FHR, LTV and STV during both FHRP A and B from 24 we
eks' gestation onwards. During FHRP A, LTV and STV are in 50% of cases
below the normal range of overall FHR variation, hampering adequate a
ssessment of the fetal condition. Therefore, we stress the importance
of including B patterns in the analysis. There is no physiological bac
kground for the assignment of periods of low and high variation, as is
done by the Sonicaid System 8002(R). However, after 30 weeks' gestati
on, computerized identification of patterns A and B may be possible us
ing techniques as presented in this article.