Me. Batt et al., A PROSPECTIVE CONTROLLED-STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC-IMAGING FOR ACUTE SHIN SPLINTS, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 30(11), 1998, pp. 1564-1571
Objective: The purpose of this prospective, observational study was to
examine the relationship of clinical examination, plain radiograph (X
R), triple-phase bone scan (TPBS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI
) in the investigation of patients presenting with acute shin splints.
Methods: 23 subjects with exercise induced lower leg pain and diffuse
tibial tenderness of less than 3 months' duration were recruited. Sub
jects were excluded if there was clinical evidence of compartment synd
rome, muscle hernia, or stress fracture. Each subject underwent XR, TP
BS, and MRI within 2 wk of physical examination. Four asymptomatic con
trols under;vent TPBS and MRI. Clinical findings. XR, TPBS, and MRI fi
ndings were independently recorded using a consistent template and sub
sequently analyzed. A single consensus lesion was chosen that provided
the greatest overlap and highest grade to allow comparison of clinica
l and imaging findings. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated fr
om data relating to clinical findings and diagnostic imaging. Results:
Eighteen subjects had bilateral symptoms and five unilateral with a m
ean duration of symptom of 5.4 wk (+/-3.5). Of 41 symptomatic lower le
gs, there were TPBS abnormalities in 36 and MRI findings in 34. Analys
is of clinical findings to TPBS and MRI demonstrated a sensitivity and
specificity of 84%, 33% and 79%, 3346, respectively. Assuming TPBS as
the ''gold-standard,'' MRI findings demonstrated a sensitivity of 95%
and specificity of 67%. There was poor agreement between the grading
of TPBS and MRI (k = 0.3). In the 5/46 asymptomatic limbs. 3/5 demonst
rated uptake on bone scan and 4/5 signal change with MRI. Imaging abno
rmalities were similarly seen in the four control patients. Conclusion
s: MRI may be used rather than TPBS and radiographs for evaluating acu
te tibial pain in athletes where avoidance of radiation exposure is de
sirable. Similar sensitivity and specificity may be expected from both
investigations; however, in the light of abnormal TPBS and MRI findin
gs in control and asymptomatic limbs, we recommend further studies be
performed to define the extent of nonpathological TPBS and MRI changes
.