Jj. Guo et al., EMPIRIC INVESTIGATION ON DIRECT COSTS-OF-ILLNESS AND HEALTH-CARE UTILIZATION OF MEDICAID PATIENTS WITH DIABETES-MELLITUS, American journal of managed care, 4(10), 1998, pp. 1433-1446
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Heath Policy & Services","Medicine, General & Internal
Objective: To determine total direct costs-of-illness and to study the
influence of different factors affecting these costs. In addition, we
examined each type of service (eg, hospitalization, outpatient care,
prescription drugs, physician encounters, and laboratory tests) for di
abetic Medicaid patients to provide evidence about the relationship be
tween diabetic patients' healthcare utilization and their related pred
ictors. Patients and Methods: A total of 7931 patients with diabetes w
ho were 65 years or younger in the Alabama Medicaid program from 1992
to 1995 were studied. Using a relational database created from Medicai
d claims, multiple regression and canonical correlation methods were u
sed to analyze the patients' direct costs-of-illness, including the co
sts associated with each healthcare service used by each patient. Resu
lts: The costs of hospitalization, outpatient care, prescription drugs
, and physician encounters were the four largest components of the dir
ect costs-of-illness for diabetic Medicaid patients, comprising 29.9%,
21.3%, 28.2%, and 14.3%, respectively. After controlling for other fa
ctors in an empiric model, the direct costs-of-illness for a patient w
ith insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus was $5160 higher than for a pa
tient with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus during the 3-year st
udy. The cost for a patient with renal dysfunction was $59,920 higher
than for other diabetic patients. Each increase in the number of diffe
rent prescribing physicians per patient was associated with a cost inc
rease of $450. Each additional comorbidity increased the cost by $735
per patient. The cost for a male patient was $2140 higher than that fo
r a female patient, and the cost for a white patient was $1330 higher
than that for a nonwhite patient. For a patient who relied on diet to
control diabetes, there were $2750 less in costs compared with other p
atients during the study period. More than 20% of the variability in p
atients' healthcare utilization costs was explained by the set of pred
ictive factors. Conclusions: The direct costs-of-illness and healthcar
e utilization for Medicaid diabetic patients were significantly accoun
ted for by the number of comorbidities, the number of different physic
ians visited, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and complications (
especially renal dysfunction). Patients who relied on dietary therapy
and exercise to control their diabetes had lower healthcare costs and
utilization than other patients: A significant amount of healthcare co
sts and utilization might be controlled or reduced if diabetes disease
management can successfully be aimed at preventing diabetic complicat
ions, controlling comorbidities, and minimizing the number of differen
t physicians visited.