Pj. Tiseo et al., AN EVALUATION OF THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF DONEPEZIL HCL IN PATIENTS WITH IMPAIRED HEPATIC-FUNCTION, British journal of clinical pharmacology, 46, 1998, pp. 51-55
Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile
of donepezil HCl (5 mg) in patients with impaired hepatic function, fo
llowing the administration of single oral doses. Methods This was an o
pen-label, non-randomized study comparing the pharmacokinetic profile
of donepezil in male volunteers with chronic compensated cirrhosis of
the liver (n = 10) to that in healthy age- and sex-matched controls (n
= 10). Each subject received a single 5 mg oral dose of donepezil. Bl
ood samples for pharmacokinetic analyses were taken at specified inter
vals up to 120-h post-dose. Concentrations of donepezil in plasma were
determined by HPLC with UV detection. Results No statistically signif
icant differences in donepezil pharmacokinetics were observed bt tween
hepatically impaired patients and normal subjects, with the exception
of C-max. The hepatically impaired patients showed a statistically si
gnificant, but not clinically significant, higher mean C-max value of
6.6 ng ml(-1) compared with the control group, which had a mean C-max
value of 4.8 ng ml(-1) (P = 0.022). This represented an increase of 37
.5%. The observed changes in AUC values were smaller and not statistic
ally different. The AUC((0-120)) and AUC((0-infinity)) were 7% and 21%
larger in the hepatically impaired patients than ill the normal subje
cts, respectively, although clearance and volume of distribution were
almost identical in the two groups. The t(1/2) increased by 20%, but t
his change was also not statistically significant. Donepezil was equal
ly well tolerated by all subjects. Conclusions This study demonstrates
that compromised hepatic function does not produce clinically signifi
cant changes in the pharmacokinetics of donepezil following single-dos
e administration. These results suggest that the administration of don
epezil to patients with hepatic disease in clinical practice should no
t require any dosing modifications.