Aj. Vickers et al., ADVICE GIVEN BY HEALTH FOOD SHOPS - IS IT CLINICALLY SAFE, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 32(5), 1998, pp. 426-428
Objective: To determine whether health shop staff give specific therap
eutic recommendations to someone who describes symptoms associated wit
h serious pathology and to determine whether they refer this person to
conventional medical care. Design: Quantitative survey using particip
ant observation. Setting: Health food shops selling herbal, homoeopath
ic or nutritional remedies in inner London. Method: A researcher visit
ed 29 health food shops and claimed to be suffering from severe, daily
headaches of recent onset. The researcher recorded on tape whether th
e health shop staff took diagnostic information; recommended any thera
peutic intervention; asked about or recommended seeing a general pract
itioner (CP); asked about use of conventional drugs. Coding of the int
eractions was carried out independently by two researchers. Results: W
hereas all but two shops recommended a specific therapeutic interventi
on, less than one in four advised a CP consultation. Forty-two differe
nt interventions were recommended. There was little consistency in the
advice given.Conclusion: Health food shops need to review the circums
tances in which they should venture to provide advice and the basis on
which they make any therapeutic recommendations. Shops selling over-t
he-counter herbal, homoeopathic and health food products are a common
feature of UK high streets. Such shops could be a useful source of hea
lth information and advice to their customers, but could also lead to
harm, for example by delaying treatment of known benefit, if their rec
ommendations were to be inaccurate or inappropriate.