J. Westermeyer et al., COMORBID DYSTHYMIA AND SUBSTANCE DISORDER - TREATMENT HISTORY AND COST, The American journal of psychiatry, 155(11), 1998, pp. 1556-1560
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment hi
story and cost of previous treatment among patients with comorbid subs
tance-related disorder and dysthymia, as compared to patients with sub
stance-related disorder only. Method: Retrospective data were obtained
regarding past treatment. Treatment cost was calculated on the basis
of the 1996 cost of various treatment modalities. The setting was alco
hol-drug programs located within departments of psychiatry in two cent
ers. A total of 642 patients were assessed, of whom 39 had substance-r
elated disorder and dysthymia and 308 had substance-related disorder o
nly (the remaining patients had other comorbid conditions). Data colle
ction instruments included an interview-based questionnaire regarding
previous psychiatric and substance abuse treatment. Current cost of tr
eatment in various settings was assessed on the basis of a survey of f
acilities used by patients in this area. Results: Patients with substa
nce-related disorder and dysthymia had received more substance-related
disorder treatment in 18 of 20 measures. Patients with substance-rela
ted disorder and dysthymia used 4.7 times more substance-related disor
der treatment dollars than patients with substance-related disorder on
ly, although their demographic characteristics were similar. Past self
-help activities and pharmacotherapy were remarkably similar for both
groups. Although substance-related disorder treatment differed conside
rably between the two groups of patients, other types of psychiatric t
reatment (i.e., non-substance-related treatment) did not differ betwee
n the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with substance-related disorde
r and dysthymia are referred to (or seek) substance-related disorder t
reatment more often than patients with substance-related disorder only
but are referred to (or seek) non-substance-related psychiatric treat
ment no more often than patients with substance-related disorder only.
The cost of previous substance-related disorder treatment was several
times higher for the patients with substance-related disorder and dys
thymia.