Checklist and ''Pollard Walk'' butterfly survey methods were contempor
aneously applied to seven public sites in North Dakota during the summ
er of 1995. Results were compared for effect of method and site on tot
al number of butterflies and total number of species detected per hour
. Checklist searching produced significantly more butterfly detections
per hour than Pollard Walks at all sites. Number of species detected
per hour did not differ significantly either among sites or between me
thods. Many species were detected by only one method, and at most site
s generalist and invader species were more likely to be observed durin
g checklist searches than during Pollard Walks. Results indicate that
checklist surveys are a more efficient means for initial determination
of a species list for a site, whereas for long-term monitoring the Po
llard Walk is more practical and statistically manageable. Pollard Wal
k transects are thus recommended once a prairie butterfly fauna has be
en defined for a site by checklist surveys.