C. Uehlinger et al., COMPARISON OF BUPRENORPHINE AND METHADONE IN THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE - SWISS MULTICENTER STUDY, European addiction research, 4, 1998, pp. 13-18
A three-centre, randomised, double-blind study was designed to compare
the efficacy and safety of buprenorphine and methadone. This was the
first European study to compare these agents and was based on a previo
us trial performed in the US. Opioid-dependent subjects were randomise
d to receive either sublingual buprenorphine or oral methadone daily.
Both objective and subjective measures of efficacy were monitored week
ly, and safety parameters were regularly monitored over the entire six
-week study. Urinalysis showed that the two treatments were similar wi
th a slight increase in opioid-negative urines noted in both groups. T
he retention rate in the buprenorphine group was lower than in the met
hadone group, although it has been suggested that the buprenorphine do
se may have been too low for some patients. None of the side effects n
oted were considered serious and all were attributable to chronic opio
id dependence. Experience of two years substitution treatment in Fribo
urg suggests that initial induction onto buprenorphine allows for pati
ents to be subgrouped before being given the most appropriate maintena
nce agent. Further investigation is required into the different dose-r
elated effects of buprenorphine seen in particular subsets of addicts.