Jc. Shlay et al., ACUPUNCTURE AND AMITRIPTYLINE FOR PAIN DUE TO HIV-RELATED PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 280(18), 1998, pp. 1590-1595
Context.-Peripheral neuropathy is common in persons infected with the
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but few data on symptomatic treatme
nt are available. Objective.-To evaluate the efficacy of a standardize
d acupuncture regimen (SAR) and amitriptyline hydrochloride for the re
lief of pain due to HIV-related peripheral neuropathy in HIV-infected
patients. Design.-Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical
trial. Each site enrolled patients into 1 of the following 3 options:
(1) a modified double-blind 2 x 2 factorial design of SAR, amitriptyl
ine, or the combination compared with placebo, (2) a modified double-b
lind design of an SAR vs control points, or (3) a double-blind design
of amitriptyline vs placebo. Setting.-Terry Beirn Community Programs f
or Clinical Research on AIDS (HIV primary care providers) in 10 US cit
ies. Patients.-Patients with HIV-associated, symptomatic, lower-extrem
ity peripheral neuropathy. Of 250 patients enrolled, 239 were in the a
cupuncture comparison (125 in the factorial option and 114 in the SAR
option vs control points option), and 136 patients were in the amitrip
tyline comparison (125 in the factorial option and 11 in amitriptyline
option vs placebo option). Interventions.-Standarized acupuncture reg
imen vs control points, amitriptyline (75 mg/d) vs placebo, or both fo
r 14 weeks. Main Outcome Measure.-Changes in mean pain scores at 6 and
14 weeks, using a pain scale ranging from 0.0 (no pain) to 1.75 (extr
emely intense), recorded daily. Results.-Patients in all 4 groups show
ed reduction in mean pain scores at 6 and 14 weeks compared with basel
ine values. For both the acupuncture and amitriptyline comparisons, ch
anges in pain score were not significantly different between the 2 gro
ups. At 6 weeks, the estimated difference in pain reduction for patien
ts in the SAR group compared with those in the control points group (a
negative value indicates a greater reduction for the ''active'' treat
ment) was 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.11 to 0.12; P=.88) an
d for patients in the amitriptyline group vs those in the placebo grou
p was -0.07 (95% CI, -0.22 to 0.08; P = .38). At 14 weeks, the differe
nce for those in the SAR group compared with those in the control poin
ts group was -0.08 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.06; P = .26) and for amitriptyl
ine compared with placebo was 0.00 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.19; P = .99). C
onclusions.-In this study, neither acupuncture nor amitriptyline was m
ore effective than placebo in relieving pain caused by HIV-related per
ipheral neuropathy.