Pa. Thurmann et al., INFLUENCE OF THE ANGIOTENSIN-II ANTAGONIST VALSARTAN ON LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION, Circulation, 98(19), 1998, pp. 2037-2042
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Peripheal Vascular Diseas",Hematology,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Background-Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) represents an independen
t risk factor in patients with essential hypertension. Because reversa
l of LVH may be associated with an improvement of prognosis, the influ
ence of new antihypertensive compounds, such as angiotensin II AT(1) r
eceptor antagonists, on LVH should be determined. Methods and Results-
In a randomized, double-blind trial, 69 predominantly previously untre
ated hypertensive patients with echocardiographically proven LVH, ie,
left ventricular mass index (LVMI) >134 g/m(2) in men and >110 g/m(2)
in women and/or end-diastolic septal thickness >12 mm, received either
the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan or atenolol for 8 months. Ech
ocardiographic data of 58 patients were available. After 8 months of v
alsartan treatment (n=29), LVMI decreased from 127+/-23 to 106+/-25 g/
m(2) (ratio [R]=0.83; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87; P<0.0001 versus baseline).
Under atenolol (n=29), LVMI decreased to a smaller extent, from 127+/
-25 to 117+/-27 g/m(2) (R=0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.98; P=0.0082 versus
baseline). The mean reduction of LVMI came to 21 g/m(2) under valsarta
n and only to 10 g/m(2) under atenolol (R=0.91; 90% CI, 0.85 to 0.97 v
ersus atenolol). Baseline mean blood pressure values were determined t
o be 163+/-12/101+/-6 mm Hg before treatment with valsartan and 160+/-
14/103+/-6 mm Hg before atenolol treatment. After 8 months of treatmen
t, mean blood pressure decreased to 146+/-13/90+/-7 mm Hg with valsart
an and to 147+/-18/90+/-7 mm Hg with atenolol. Nine patients in the va
lsartan group and 8 patients in the atenolol group required additional
medication with hydrochlorothiazide. Conclusions-Antihypertensive tre
atment with the angiotensin II antagonist valsartan for 8 months produ
ced a significant regression of LVH in predominantly previously untrea
ted patients with essential hypertension. The drug may be safely admin
istered in this subset of hypertensive patients; however, the long-ter
m benefit in terms of risk reduction has still to be evaluated in furt
her trials.