Jpen. Pierie et al., CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT, MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY AS METHODS OF MEASURING THE SIZE OF BREAST-CANCER - A COMPARISON, Breast, 7(5), 1998, pp. 247-250
The size of a breast cancer is used for selection of surgical treatmen
t modalities and assessment of nonoperative treatment of the tumour. T
o investigate prospectively which method could predict tumour size rel
iably, the tumour size was measured in 138 consecutive female patients
with palpable breast cancer, using palpation, mammography and ultraso
nography. These measurements were correlated with the histological siz
e. The correlation coefficients between clinical assessment, mammograp
hy, ultrasonography and histological size were 0.71, 0.65 and 0.80 aft
er logistic transformation of the data, respectively. Clinical assessm
ent overestimates the tumour size, whereas mammography and ultrasonogr
aphy slightly underestimate the size. This study demonstrates that ult
rasonography appears to be a feasible and the most reliable method for
pre-operative assessment of the size of palpable breast carcinomas.