CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT, MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY AS METHODS OF MEASURING THE SIZE OF BREAST-CANCER - A COMPARISON

Citation
Jpen. Pierie et al., CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT, MAMMOGRAPHY AND ULTRASONOGRAPHY AS METHODS OF MEASURING THE SIZE OF BREAST-CANCER - A COMPARISON, Breast, 7(5), 1998, pp. 247-250
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
BreastACNP
ISSN journal
09609776
Volume
7
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
247 - 250
Database
ISI
SICI code
0960-9776(1998)7:5<247:CMAUAM>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
The size of a breast cancer is used for selection of surgical treatmen t modalities and assessment of nonoperative treatment of the tumour. T o investigate prospectively which method could predict tumour size rel iably, the tumour size was measured in 138 consecutive female patients with palpable breast cancer, using palpation, mammography and ultraso nography. These measurements were correlated with the histological siz e. The correlation coefficients between clinical assessment, mammograp hy, ultrasonography and histological size were 0.71, 0.65 and 0.80 aft er logistic transformation of the data, respectively. Clinical assessm ent overestimates the tumour size, whereas mammography and ultrasonogr aphy slightly underestimate the size. This study demonstrates that ult rasonography appears to be a feasible and the most reliable method for pre-operative assessment of the size of palpable breast carcinomas.