Ks. Schulz et al., TRANSVERSE PLANE EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF SURGICAL TECHNIQUE ON STEM POSITIONING AND GEOMETRY OF RECONSTRUCTION IN CANINE TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT, American journal of veterinary research, 59(8), 1998, pp. 1071-1079
Objectives-To test whether femoral ostectomy level, subtrochanteric bo
ne mass removal, and stem-size selection significantly affect stem pos
itioning in canine total hip replacement, and to determine ability of
the femoral stem component to restore geometry of the normal femoral h
ead and neck. Sample population-Femurs from 8 adult mixed-breed canine
cadavers. Procedure-Femurs were systematically prepared, using 8 comb
inations of 3 surgical preparation techniques that included level of o
stectomy (cervical isthmus vs lesser trochanter), subtrochanteric bone
block removal, and femoral stem size (recommended, undersized). Compu
ter-aided analysis of specimen photographs was used to evaluate femora
l head offset and position and variability of femoral stem positioning
for each of the preparation combinations. Results-Original femoral he
ad offset and position were reconstructed to within a mean of 0.052 an
d 0.031 cm, respectively, using an undersized femoral stem after ostec
tomy at the level of the lesser trochanter. Implantation of an undersi
zed femoral stem after subtrochanteric bone block removal improved abi
lity to centralize the distal tip of the implant and reduce the angle
between the femoral diaphyseal and implant axes. Ostectomy at the leve
l of the cervical isthmus tended to force femoral implants into a varu
s position, and ostectomy at the level of the lesser trochanter tended
to force implants into a valgus position. Conclusions-Geometry of nor
mal canine femurs was most closely reconstructed by implantation of an
undersized femoral component after ostectomy at the revel of the less
er trochanter. Implantation of an undersized femoral component after s
ubtrochanteric bone block removal resulted in the best alignment and c
entralization of the stem.