Sj. Hunter et al., PREDICTING RETURN TO WORK - A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF RAILROAD WORKERS AFTER LOW-BACK INJURIES, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(21), 1998, pp. 2319-2328
Study Design. Evaluation of the long-term outcomes of 178 railroad emp
loyees with low back injury who had completed a multidisciplinary reha
bilitation program, Objectives. To study two major areas: 1) outcomes
of the rehabilitation program in terms of the patient's improvement in
function and rate of return to work and 2) factors that predict long-
term retention at work, both at the railroad and elsewhere. Summary of
Background Data. Several studies have been published examining rehabi
litation outcomes of individuals covered under workers' compensation l
aw, but few exist that have examined railroad workers covered by the F
ederal Employers Liability Act, and few studies exist with follow-up p
eriods longer than 3 years. Methods. Physical/medical, self-reported,
and employment/financial data were collected on each patient from medi
cal and employment records. Follow-up data regarding employment status
were obtained either from he employer or from the patient by telephon
e interview. Results. On average, the patients improved in all objecti
ve and subjective measures after rehabilitation. Improvements in these
measures were not predictive of return to work. At follow-up examinat
ion, 89% of the contacted patients were employed-61% still at the rail
road. The employment factors of lost work days and length of employmen
t and the financial factor of wage rate were the most predictive of lo
ng-term work status. Conclusions. The multidisciplinary program in the
current study was found to improve patient physical functioning and r
educe pain. However, success in these measures was not predictive of l
ong-term work status, suggesting that other factors have an impact on
work status. Clinicians must be aware that employment nad financial fa
ctors may have a strong influence on return-to-work outcomes.