Cj. Main et G. Waddell, SPINE UPDATE - BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES TO EXAMINATION - A REAPPRAISAL OFTHE INTERPRETATION OF NONORGANIC SIGNS, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 23(21), 1998, pp. 2367-2371
Waddell et al in 1980 developed a standardized assessment of behaviora
l responses to examination. The signs were associated with other clini
cal measures of illness behavior and distress, and are not simply a fe
ature of medicolegal presentations. Despite clear caveats about the in
terpretation of the signs, they have been and misused both clinically
and medicolegally. Behavioral responses to examination provide useful
clinical information, but need to be interpreted with care and underst
anding. isolated signs should not be overinterpreted. Multiple signs s
uggest that the patient does not have a straightforward physical probl
em, but that psychological factors also need to be considered. Some pa
tients may require both physical management of their physical patholog
y and more careful management of the psychosocial and behavioral aspec
ts of their illness. Behavioral signs should be understood as response
s affected by fear in the context of recovery from injury and the deve
lopment of chronic incapacity. They offer only a psychological ''yello
w-flag'' and not a complete psychological assessment. Behavioral signs
are not on their own a test of credibility or faking.