Sa. Mcclave et al., ARE PATIENTS FED APPROPRIATELY ACCORDING TO THEIR CALORIC REQUIREMENTS, JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 22(6), 1998, pp. 375-381
Background: Specific morbidity related to underfeeding and overfeeding
necessitates the design of nutrition support regimens that provide ca
lories equal to those required on the basis of energy expenditure. Thi
s prospective multicenter trial was designed to determine what percent
of patients in long-term acute care facilities receive feeding approp
riate to their needs and whether accuracy of feeding has an impact on
patient clinical status. Methods: Patients on mechanical ventilation w
ho were hospitalized at 32 Vencor Hospitals over a g-week period and w
ho were receiving only enteral nutrition by continuous infusion at a p
resumed goal rate were evaluated once by indirect calorimetry (IC) whi
le on feeding. Caloric intake over the preceding 24 hours was determin
ed by physician orders and by patient intake/output (I/O) record. Calo
ric requirements were defined by measured resting energy expenditure (
REE) + 10% for activity. Degree of metabolism was defined by the ratio
: (measured PEE/Harris-Benedict predicted REE) x 100, and the degree o
f feeding by the ratio: (calories provided/calories required) x 100. R
esults: IC was performed on 335 patients (mean, 11.2 patients per cent
er; range, 1 to 32), of which 72 were excluded for nonphysiological re
sults or failure to achieve steady state, 21 for receiving parenteral
nutrition, and 29 for not being on mechanical ventilation at time of t
esting. The 213 study patients were 58.7% male with mean age 70.1 year
s (range, 20 to 90 years). Measured REE was <25 kcal/kg in 66.2% of pa
tients and 25 to 35 kcal/kg in 28.6%. Barely half (48.4%) of this pati
ent population was hypermetabolic. Based on physician orders, the majo
rity of patients (58.2%) were overfed, receiving >110% of required cal
ories, and 12.2% were underfed, receiving <90% of requirements. Discre
pancies based on I/O records, however, suggested that 36.1% of patient
s received <90% of those calories ordered. By either basis, only about
25% of patients received feeding within 10% of required calories. The
percent of patients being overfed varied between centers, ranging fro
m 32.2% to 92.8%, and was not affected by years of facility IC experie
nce or volume of IC studies per month. The pattern of caloric provisio
n as measured by degree of feeding correlated inversely to degree of m
etabolism (p <.0001, R-2 =.24). Accuracy of feeding had an impact on v
entilatory status, as degree of feeding correlated inversely with minu
te ventilation (p =.001, R-2 =.05). Degree of overfeeding also led to
significant increases in azotemia (p =.033, R-2 =.02). Extrapolating s
tudy data over 1 year, reduction in excess volume of enteral formula w
ould have resulted in a cost savings of up to $1.3 million for the Ven
cor system. Conclusions: Because energy expenditure is difficult to pr
edict on the basis of conventional equations, patients in long-term ac
ute care facilities routinely are overfed and underfed, with only 25%
receiving calories within 10% of required needs. Measuring a patient's
energy requirement at least once by IC is important, because the degr
ee of metabolism predicts how easily a patient will be underfed or ove
rfed. The amount of infused calories should be compared with caloric r
equirements measured by IC, because the accuracy or degree of underfee
ding or overfeeding has an impact on ventilatory status and the likeli
hood for developing azotemia. Although physician practice or bias may
reduce the optimal clinical effect, the use of IC to determine caloric
requirements may result in significant cost savings.