EFFECTS OF UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT ON PATTERNS OF HOSPITAL-CARE AMONG PRIVATELY INSURED ADULT PATIENTS

Citation
Tm. Wickizer et D. Lessler, EFFECTS OF UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT ON PATTERNS OF HOSPITAL-CARE AMONG PRIVATELY INSURED ADULT PATIENTS, Medical care, 36(11), 1998, pp. 1545-1554
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Heath Policy & Services","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Health Care Sciences & Services
Journal title
ISSN journal
00257079
Volume
36
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1545 - 1554
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-7079(1998)36:11<1545:EOUMOP>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
OBJECTIVES. This study examined the effects of utilization management review activities on patterns of hospital fare among a sample of adult patients insured through a managed fee-for-service plan. METHODS. The study was a retrospective analysis of insurance administrative data r epresenting a case series of patients for whom utilization management review was performed. Two review activities were analyzed: pre-admissi on review and concurrent (continued stay) review. Patients were 49,654 privately insured adult patients reviewed for care between January 19 89 and December 1993. Review outcomes included inpatient or outpatient care denied, site of treatment shifted (from inpatient to outpatient) , or reduction in requested hospital days (total days requested - tota l days approved). RESULTS. Few patients (<1%) were denied care at time of admission or were required to obtain outpatient instead of inpatie nt care. More common was action taken to limit length of stay by concu rrent review, which accounted for 83% of the total reduction (25,197 r equested days) in inpatient care. Utilization management became more r estrictive with time: the number of days approved declined by 15% to 5 0% from 1990 to 1993, depending on the type of admission. Utilization management was most forceful in restricting care for mental health pat ients, who represented 5.7% of the study population but accounted for 54.7% of the total reduction in requested days. CONCLUSIONS. The utili zation management program appeared to limit hospital care by managing length of stay once patients were admitted. The effects of restricting length of stay in this manner on quality and health outcomes should b e investigated.