Rr. Mcgregor et al., EFFECT OF REMIFENTANIL ON THE AUDITORY-EVOKED RESPONSE AND HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES AFTER INTUBATION AND SURGICAL INCISION, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 81(5), 1998, pp. 785-786
We have observed the effect of intubation and incision, as measured by
the auditory evoked response (AER) and haemodynamic variables, in 12
patients undergoing hernia repair or varicose vein surgery who receive
d remifentanil as part of either an inhaled anaesthetic technique usin
g isoflurane or as pa rt of a total i.v. technique using propofol. Ana
esthesia was induced with remifentanil 1 mu g kg(-1) and propofol, neu
romuscular block was achieved with atracurium 0.6 mg kg(-1) before int
ubation, and anaesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of
remifentanil in combination with either a continuous infusion of propo
fol or inhaled isoflurane. The AER and haemodynamic variables were mea
sured before and after intubation and incision. The effects of intubat
ion and incision on the AER and haemodynamic variables were not signif
icantly different between the remifentanil-propofol and remifentanil-i
soflurane groups. However, the study had a low power for this comparis
on. When the data for the two anaesthetic combinations were pooled, th
e only significant effects were increases in diastolic arterial pressu
re and heart rate immediately after intubation; these were not seen 5
min after intubation. There were no cardiovascular responses to incisi
on. There were no significant changes in the AER after intubation or i
ncision.