Objective: We undertook to determine whether adverse food reactions pl
ay a role in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methods: A systematic rev
iew of the literature using Medline (1980-1996), targeting IBS and adv
erse food reactions, was performed. All clinical trials whereby dietar
y exclusion was followed by food challenge were selected. Each study w
as reviewed using a structured format to examine methodological issues
and study outcomes. Results: Of the seven studies included, the posit
ive response to an elimination diet ranged from 15% to 71%; double-bli
nd placebo-controlled challenges identified problem foods in 6% to 58%
of cases. Milk, wheat, and eggs were most frequently identified to ca
use symptom exacerbation; of the foods identified the most common trai
t was a high salicylate content. Foods high in amines were also identi
fied. Studies of diarrhea-predominant IBS identified a higher percenta
ge of adverse food reactions. However, all studies had major limitatio
ns in their trial designs, including inadequate patient selection, app
ropriateness of-and duration of-exclusion diets, and methods of food c
hallenge. Conclusion: Whether adverse reactions to foods are a key fac
tor in exacerbating IBS symptoms or whether dietary manipulation is a
valid treatment option is unclear. Carefully designed controlled clini
cal trials are now needed to specifically test the potential role of a
dverse food reactions in diarrhea-predominant IBS. (C) 1998 by Am. Cel
l. of Gastroenterology.