Cp. Smith et al., MANAGEMENT OF IMPENDING PENILE PROSTHESIS EROSION WITH A POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE DISTAL WIND SOCK GRAFT, The Journal of urology, 160(6), 1998, pp. 2037-2040
Purpose: Erosion of penile prostheses can be calamitous, often leaving
patients unable to accommodate further implants. There is a paucity o
f literature describing impending erosion of penile prosthesis. We rep
ort on 5 patients with impending erosion of a penile prosthesis who un
derwent polytetrafluoroethylene distal wind sock graft placement. Mate
rials and Methods: From 1993 to 1997, 5 patients with a mean age of 49
years and impending penile prosthesis erosion underwent 6 revisions u
sing a polytetrafluoroethylene distal wind sock graft. Two patients un
derwent simultaneous bilateral grafts while 1 patient underwent separa
te right and left grafts 3 years apart. Indications for reconstruction
included distal migration of the prosthetic cylinders into the glans
in 4 patients and impingement of the distal urethra in 2. Of the patie
nts 3 were spinal cord injured, 1 had lumbar radiculopathy and 1 had a
history of pelvic irradiation. Inflatable prostheses were implanted i
n 4 patients, while 1 received a malleable prosthesis. Results: Patien
ts underwent a mean of 1.5 penile prosthetic revisions (0 to 4) before
diagnosis of impending erosion. An interval of 8 to 144 months (mean
66) elapsed from the most recent penile prosthesis insertion until dis
tal wind sock graft placement. Mean operative time was 1 hour 51 minut
es (1.3 to 2.5 hours). Mean hospital stay was 6.3 days (3 to 12). At a
mean followup of 32 months (0.7 to 5.2 years) all patients had satisf
actory and functional erections with no pain or evidence of impending
erosion or penile prosthesis infection: Conclusions: Erosion of a peni
le prosthesis can have disastrous consequences. We describe a safe and
effective technique for managing impending penile prosthesis erosion
using a polytetrafluoroethylene distal wind sock graft.