THE COMBINATION OF PREOPERATIVE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND POSTOPERATIVE PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN OUTCOME IN CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER
Av. Damico et al., THE COMBINATION OF PREOPERATIVE PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND POSTOPERATIVE PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN OUTCOME IN CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER, The Journal of urology, 160(6), 1998, pp. 2096-2101
Purpose: The independent clinical and pathological predictors of time
to postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure were used to
identify prostate cancer patients at high risk for this end point. Mat
erials and Methods: A Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to
determine the prognostic significance of preoperative PSA, pathologic
al stage, prostatectomy Gleason score and margin status in predicting
the time to postoperative PSA failure in 862 men with palpable (T2) or
PSA detected (Tlc) prostate cancer. The 2-year PSA failure rates with
95% confidence intervals were calculated using the results of Cox reg
ression analysis and a bootstrap procedure with 2,000 replications, re
spectively, and are presented in nomogram format stratified by preoper
ative PSA, pathological stage, prostatectomy Gleason score and margin
status. Results: Preoperative PSA (p = 0.0001), pathological stage (p
less than or equal to 0.002), margin status (p = 0.0001) and prostatec
tomy Gleason score (p = 0.034) were independent predictors of time to
postoperative PSA failure, Conclusions: Patients at high risk for earl
y PSA failure could be identified postoperatively on the basis of preo
perative PSA and prostatectomy pathology. Adjuvant therapy trials in t
hese select patients may be justified.