Kj. Donly et al., EFFECT OF TOPICAL FLUORIDE APPLICATION BEFORE AND AFTER AMALGAM RESTORATION PLACEMENT ON RECURRENT CARIES INHIBITION, American journal of dentistry, 11(4), 1998, pp. 151-153
Purpose: To evaluate the in vitro caries inhibition effects of 1.23% A
PF foam topical fluoride treatment of cavity preparations, prior to re
storation placement and after restoration placement. Materials and Met
hods: Sixty standardized Class V preparations were placed in molars. R
andomly, 40 teeth received an amalgam restoration. Twenty other teeth
had Ice 1.23% APF foam applied to preparation surfaces for 1 minute, t
hen an amalgam restoration was placed. The APF was not rinsed away pri
or to restoration, it was displaced by the pressure of the amalgam bei
ng condensed into the preparation. Twenty of the initial 40 amalgam re
storations had 1 cc 1.23% APF foam applied to the external tooth/resto
ration margins for 4 minutes, the remaining 20 amalgam restorations ac
ted as the controls. Acid-resistant varnish was placed, leaving 1 mm o
f tooth adjacent to restoration margins exposed. All specimens were su
bjected to an artificial caries challenge (pH 4.4) for 5 days. Section
s of 100 mu m were cut longitudinally through the restored margins, ph
otographed under polarized light microscopy, then demineralized areas
adjacent to restoration margins were quantitated. Results: Results dem
onstrated the mean (+/- S.D.) area (mu m(2)) of demineralization 100 l
an from the restoration margins to be: amalgam 10,221 +/- 524, amalgam
with 1-minute APF over preparation 529 +/- 557, amalgam with 4-minute
APF over external surface 736 +/- 359. ANOVA and Duncan's (P< 0.05) i
ndicated both 1.23% APF foam topical fluoride treatment regimens exhib
ited significantly less demineralization at restoration margins than t
he non-treated amalgam control. There was no significant difference be
tween the two fluoride placement regimens examined in this study.