A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS IN PREDICTING STATIC PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION IN ARTICULATING JOINTS
Citation
Ga. Li et al., A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS IN PREDICTING STATIC PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION IN ARTICULATING JOINTS, Journal of biomechanics, 30(6), 1997, pp. 635-638
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Biomedical",Biophysics
SICI code
0021-9290(1997)30:6<635:ACODMI>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Pressure distribution along the contact surface of an articulating joi
nt model was analyzed using different numerical and analytical methods
: a discrete rigid element method [rigid-body-spring-model (RBSM)], th
e finite element method (FEM), a simplified elasticity solution (SES)
and the modified Hertzian (MH) theory. The FEM and MH methods modeled
joints interposed with elastic layers, while the RBSM and SES methods
assumed a simplified joint with a rigid convex indenter on an elastic
concave surface. Results for an axisymmetric joint model indicate that
all of these methods predict similar pressure distributions on joint
surfaces. In non-axisymmetric deformation mode, the RBSM method and FE
M calculation showed good agreement in contact pressure prediction. Co
mpared to the other three methods, the RBSM is relatively simple and e
ffective in predicting joint contact pressure under symmetric and non-
symmetric loading. The computational efficiency of the RBSM method is
particularly attractive for pre-operative planning of reconstructive s
urgical procedures in orthopaedics in which geometric changes dictate
the eventual outcome of the surgery. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.