P. Couture et al., HEMODYNAMIC-EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL PERITONEAL RETRACTION DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 44(5), 1997, pp. 467-472
Purpose: Abdominal wall retraction (AWR) was recently proposed as an a
lternative for CO2 pneumopentoneum. In this study we evaluated the car
diorespiratory effects of AWR during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Met
hods: Fifteen patients were studied during laparoscopic cholecystectom
y using AWR. Monitoring included heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressu
re (MAP), pulse oxymetry (SpO(2)), end-tidal CO2 (PETCO2), minute vent
ilation, and peak inspiratory pressure (PIP). Using transoesophageal e
chocardiography, the transgastric short axis view was obtained to deri
ve the end-diastolic area (EDA), the end-systolic area (ESA), and the
ejection fraction (EF). These parameters were measured at predetermine
d periods: I) live minutes after anaesthetic induction, 2) five minute
s after AWR insertion, 3) 15 min after AWR insertion, and 4) after the
end of surgery. Results: No change in any measured parameter was obse
rved over time in the AWR group except for an increase in MAP (P<0.05)
after AWR insertion. There were no changes in EDA, ESA and EF during
the study, reflecting stable global cardiac function. In addition, no
embolic episodes were observed during surgery. Conclusion: Our results
demonstrate that the use of gasless abdominal distention for laparosc
opic cholecystectomy results in a stable haemodynamic profile in healt
hy patients without cardiac disease, except for a brief increase in MA
P after the AWR insertion. The advantages of AWR over conventional pne
umoperitoneum should be confirmed in higher risk patients in a prospec
tive, randomized study.