The explanatory styles of 387 law students were assessed prior to law
school using the Attributional Style Questionnaire (ASQ). Longitudinal
performance measures were collected throughout law school and related
to each student's initial explanatory style. In contrast to studies w
ith undergraduates, students who made stable, global, and internal att
ributions for negative events combined with the converse attributions
for success (typically called pessimists) outperformed more optimistic
students on measures of grade point averages and law journal success.
We discuss the limitations of current attributional research methodol
ogies and suggest the prudent and cautious perspective necessary for l
aw or skill-based professions may account for our findings. (C) 1997 b
y John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.