The aim of the study was to evaluate atrial septal (AS) pacing guided
by electrophysiological study (EPS), as an alternative treatment modal
ity in patients (pts) with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
We evaluated 7 pts (5M, 2F, 58+/- 5.6 years) with drug refractory PAF.
The incidence of symptomatic PAF was 1.2+/- 0.4 episodes per pt/month
during the last 6 months. All pts had P wave duration (3) 100ms (118/- 10 ms) on the surface EGG. During the EPS the AS was paced from mul
tiple sites. We considered the site of AS where the timing between the
high right atrium and distal coronary sinus electrograms was pound 10
ms, as the most suitable site in order to decrease the interatrial co
nduction time. A standard active fixation screw-in lead (Medtronic 406
8, Medtronic 4568) was attached to the interatrial septum at this site
which was superior to the coronary sinus os, close to the fossa ovali
s. A DDD-R generator (Medtronic Thera DR) was implanted and programmed
initially in AAT mode, 75 bpm. During a follow-up period of 6+/- 3 mo
nths, 2 pts were free of symptoms. In 5 pts the PAF recurred and the p
acing mode was programmed to DDD-R and antiarrhythmics restarted. One
pt remained asymptomatic, and in 2 pts the arrhythmia recurred I but t
he pts reported significant improvement, so no further treatment was r
equired. The last 2 pts remained severely symptomatic and atrioventric
ular junctional ablation was decided. We conclude that AS pacing in pt
s with drug refractory PAF is a challenging new technique. The limited
population of our study cannot be used for safe validation of the met
hod. Our initial experience suggests that certain pts with PAF can be
improved by this method.