Rl. Harvey et al., STROKE REHABILITATION - CLINICAL PREDICTORS OF RESOURCE UTILIZATION, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 79(11), 1998, pp. 1349-1355
Objective: To identify predictors of rehabilitation hospital resource
utilization for patients with stroke, using demographic, medical, and
functional information available on admission. Design: Statistical ana
lysis of data prospectively collected from stroke rehabilitation patie
nts. Setting: Large, urban, academic freestanding rehabilitation facil
ity. Participants: A total of 945 stroke patients consecutively admitt
ed for acute inpatient rehabilitation. Main Outcome Measures: Resource
utilization was measured by rehabilitation length of stay (LOS) and m
ean hospital charge per day (CPD). Methods: Independent variables were
organized into categories derived from four consecutive phases of cli
nical assessment: (1) patient referral information, (2) acute hospital
record review and patient history, (3) physical examination, and (4)
functional assessment. predictors for LOS and CPD were identified sepa
rately using four stepwise multiple linear regression analyses startin
g with variables from the first category and adding new category data
for each subsequent analysis. Results: Severe neurologic impairment, a
s measured by Rasch-converted NIH stroke scale and lower Rasch-convert
ed motor measure of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrume
nt predicted longer LOS (F-2,F-824 = 231.9, p <.001). Lower Rasch-conv
erted motor FIM instrument measure, tracheostomy, feeding tube, and a
history of pneumonia, coronary artery disease, or renal failure predic
ted higher CPD (F-6,F-820 = 90.2, p <.001). Conclusion: Stroke rehabil
itation LOS and CPD are predicted by different factors. Seven impairme
nt and motor disability are the main predictors of longer LOS; motor d
isability and medical comorbidities predict higher CPD. These findings
will help clinicians anticipate resource needs of stroke rehabilitati
on patients using medical history, physical examination, and functiona
l assessment. (C) 1998 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medi
cine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.