Da. Sala et al., CRUTCH HANDLE DESIGN - EFFECT ON PALMAR LOADS DURING AMBULATION, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 79(11), 1998, pp. 1473-1476
Objective: To compare loads, load distributions, pressures, and areas
of weight-bearing on the palm for forearm crutches with cylindrical an
d wide handles during ambulation to determine if one handle type produ
ced greater loads on the car-pal tunnel region. Design: Single-group r
epeated measures of normal adults; descriptive study of patients who w
ere long-term crutch users. Data were collected from six palmar region
s using an F-Scan system. Setting: Center for neuromuscular disorders
in a hospital. Participants: Thirty normal volunteers and 6 patients.
Main Outcome Measure: Differences in loads for the palmer regions betw
een the two handles, particularly the carpal tunnel region, Results: F
or the normal adults, significantly greater loads were found in two di
stal regions for the cylindrical handle and in one proximal legion for
the wide handle. Distribution of weight-bearing loads showed a simila
r pattern for both handles with the palm's proximal and distal radial
sides having the greatest loads and the carpal tunnel region having th
e third highest load. The area of weight-bearing was significantly gre
ater for the wide handle than for the cylindrical. Conclusions: Cylind
rical and wide crutch handles have similar load distributions, making
it impossible to recommend one type over the other to reduce the occur
rence of carpal tunnel syndrome. The wide handle distributes the loads
over a greater surface area, producing less focal pressure. (C) 1998
by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine ann the American A
cademy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.