CHRONIC ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE LEFT VENTROINTERMEDIATE (VIM) THALAMIC NUCLEUS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PHARMACOTHERAPY-RESISTANT PARKINSONS-DISEASE - A DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON ACCESS TO SEMANTIC AND EPISODICMEMORY
Ai. Troster et al., CHRONIC ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE LEFT VENTROINTERMEDIATE (VIM) THALAMIC NUCLEUS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PHARMACOTHERAPY-RESISTANT PARKINSONS-DISEASE - A DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT ON ACCESS TO SEMANTIC AND EPISODICMEMORY, Brain and cognition, 38(2), 1998, pp. 125-149
Thalamotomy for medically refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) is consi
dered to be efficacious and relatively safe. Because a minority of pat
ients experience decrements in language and memory (often mild and tra
nsient) after thalamotomy, chronic thalamic deep brain stimulation (DB
S) might be a safer treatment given its reversibility and the modifiab
ility of stimulation parameters. Two preliminary studies support the r
elative cognitive safety of unilateral DBS of the ventral intermediate
(Vim) thalamic nucleus, but it is unclear whether possibly subtle cha
nges in language and memory represent effects of ''microthalamotomy''
or of stimulation per se. This report provides preliminary data concer
ning effects of left thalamic stimulation on information processing sp
eed, semantic memory (verbal fluency and visual confrontation naming),
and verbal episodic memory in a patient with PD. In addition to being
evaluated before and 3 and 6 months after surgery, the patient was te
sted 18 months after surgery either on or off medications and with the
stimulator turned either on or off (order counterbalanced across medi
cation conditions). Test performance differences between the stimulati
on conditions were attenuated ''off'' as compared to ''on'' medication
. Vim stimulation consistently, albeit subtly, improved semantic verba
l fluency but interfered with immediate recall of word lists. Parallel
s to findings from acute, intraoperative thalamic stimulation studies
are explored. The hypothesis is offered that left Vim stimulation migh
t facilitate access to semantic memory, but interfere with episodic me
mory processes, (C) 1998 Academic Press.